Skip to main content
Gap Analysis automatically evaluates your control implementation status against your adopted frameworks. It surfaces which controls are not yet started, in progress, or need review — then helps you generate a prioritized remediation plan.

What you can do

  • Select frameworks — Choose one or more adopted frameworks to analyze
  • View gap summary — Implementation percentage, count of gaps, critical gaps (required controls not started), and domain breakdown
  • Review domain details — Drill into each compliance domain (e.g. Access Control, Cryptography) and see individual control status
  • Prioritize remediation — Gaps are ranked by requirement level (required vs. addressable) and status
  • Create remediation tickets — Select gaps and auto-generate tickets with guidance and checklists pre-filled

How to run a gap analysis

1

Open Gap Analysis

Navigate to Compliance → Gap Analysis.
2

Select frameworks

Choose one or more frameworks you’ve adopted. You’ll see implementation stats and a list of all controls.
3

Review the gap overview

The summary shows total controls, implemented count, in-progress count, and gaps.
4

Expand domains

Click any domain (e.g. “Logical and Physical Access Control”) to see which controls in that domain are gaps.
5

Create remediation tickets

Select the gaps you want to address and click Create Remediation Tickets to generate one ticket per control.

Control status definitions

StatusMeaningRemediation action
ImplementedControl is deployed and testedDocument evidence; no gap
In ProgressWork is underwayContinue; track completion
Needs ReviewImplemented but not yet verifiedTest or audit the control
Not StartedControl has not been addressedCreate ticket and begin work
N/AControl does not apply to your organizationNo action required

Critical gaps alert

The analysis flags Critical Gaps — controls that are both Required by your framework and Not Started. These appear in a red alert box. Addressable gaps (good-to-have, but not required) are lower priority.
If you have critical gaps when an audit begins, auditors will require evidence of a remediation plan or risk-acceptance documentation. Address critical gaps first.

Domain breakdown

Each framework is organized by domain (e.g. “CC6 — Logical & Physical Access Controls” for SOC 2). The analysis shows:
  • Total controls in the domain
  • Counts: implemented, in progress, gaps, N/A
  • Each control with its code, title, and status

Remediation tickets

When you click Create Remediation Tickets, one ticket is generated per selected control with the control code, title, domain, and implementation guidance pre-filled. Tickets are assigned to your compliance/engineering team. As they close tickets, update the control status in Controls to keep the gap analysis current.

Implementation percentage

The percentage shows: (Implemented + In Progress) / Total controls. For example, 50 total controls with 20 implemented and 15 in progress = 70%. Use this to track progress over time toward your audit date.

Frequently asked questions

Yes. Select multiple frameworks and the system deduplicates controls that appear in more than one, showing a combined remediation plan.
Tickets appear with a link back to the control in Regentra. As you complete work, update the control status to In Progress or Implemented to keep the gap analysis current.
At the start of audit prep (3-6 months before audit), then monthly to track progress. Re-run when adopting new frameworks.
Yes. Mark them Not Applicable in the Controls view. They won’t count as gaps.